Global Urbanization Conference Plenary Speakers: Agnew, Dorling, Florida, Le Gales, Roy, Storper - RSA at UCLA - December 16-18, 2013 - Register Now
Conference Chairman: Professor Michael Storper, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA;
Conference organiser: Elizabeth Mitchell, Regional Studies Association
25 Clinton Place – Seaford – BN25 4QU – UK
Tel: 00 44 (0)1323 899 698 – Fax: 00 44 (0)1323 899 798
Email: events@regionalstudies.org
Reg. Charity No. 1084165 – Reg. in England and Wales No. 4116288
These three thoughts, theses if you will, are the basis of the "community motive."
July 30, 2013
Dear Reader:
Dear Reader:
Based on my experience as a regional planner and agency
director, 1973 -2008, and in recognition of emerging "regional
communities," I developed three thoughts about community that
relate to the challenge of working across-boundaries as greater or
regional communities. The thoughts/theses apply for communities at the scale of
bonding or bridging social capital as defined by Robert D. Putnam,
which is alternately local or regional. (Link below)
As of 2011, considering the global financial crisis
brought about by pursuit of the "profit motive," it struck me that
this has come to dominate modern life. This is a relatively new invention of
civilization and wasn't a concern for most of the time that Homo
sapiens has been on the planet.
The three thoughts below that had emerged in my
experience of working on regional cooperation now represent what I
now posit as the "community motive." Concern about “profit" can
emerge within an established community over time, but, to my mind the
"profit motive" does not exist in the wild.
1) Community precedes cooperation.
2) Community is how life solves all problems.
3) Security is the primary purpose of community.
These three thoughts, theses if you will, are the basis of the
"community motive. “Following is some exposition about each one.
As I see it, security has always been the priority for
humans since the plains of Africa. That's why communities first seek
to establish defensible boundaries. After the basics are in place,
security focus shifts to the social and economic. Boundaries work
like the membrane in the osmosis experiment most of us have seen in
a science class. The membrane is a filter that lets the good things pass
through, but keeps unwanted things out. (Osmosis -YouTube - 45 sec.)
The evolved political boundaries of today have
consequence. The rules change when you cross them. Though marked on the ground
and fortified in some instances, they are conceptual, as pictured to the
right, with Universe Man and here in a PDF. The boundary divides the space between local, that within, and
regional, everything outside, as labeled in the second panel. The third panel
repeats the image within, to show, without graphic elegance, that the
land on which Universe Man sits is regional at another scale, as
determined by other boundaries, and another area that's local. A territory
is both local and regional, depending upon the perspective.
Communities of communities, “regional communities” are
greater communities organized to solve a problem, be it managing a
watershed, strengthening an economic cluster or ensuring peer
competition for school sports. Regional boundaries can be imposed for administrative
purposes within states, but for these to be a basis for effective cooperation;
a greater community sense is needed for that geography among the
people. This is true for multi-state and multi-national regional
communities as well. The leaders with such a vision can build
a regional community by finding that which is already in place.
This is not to suggest that community is easy to build
in order to solve problems. In a crisis, humans of any culture,
belief or politics can quickly come together and self-organize to save
themselves and others. It was the on-the- ground response to the 9/11 attacks
that demonstrated to me the deep responsiveness of human community, as well as
the fundamental importance of security. Community is how humans have always
survived. This, I think, extends to all life forms.
The "community motive" comes into play when there is a
problem to be solved. In a monetized civilization, the "profit
motive" may be an incentive for some action, but most of the problems of
life don't have a check at the end for their solution. They are things that
must be done. Because this is the case, humanity has been able to perpetuate. To solve problems then, regional/greater community motivation
activates in one or more individuals.
We must thank Aldo Leopold for the term. He wrote: “Acts of
conservation without the requisite desire and skills are futile. To create
these desires and skills and the community motive is the task of education.” —"Conservation: In Whole or in
Part? (1944); RMG 319
The concept of “community motive” did not take hold, but it should
have. It is now more important than ever, since the “profit motive” requires
regional/greater community management at wholistic scales.
Thoughts welcome.
Tom
Tom
Regional/Greater Community Motivation - News & Thought is presented here: Community Motive –Collaboration – Cooperation Tweets and in the Flipboard magazine “Community Motive –Greater/Regional Communities”
To learn about bridging and bonding social capital, read Robert Putnam here Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community
To learn about bridging and bonding social capital, read Robert Putnam here Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community
My first blog post here about the focus on community motive
Tom
Christoffel, AICP, FeRSA
Regional
Intelligence - Regional Communities, LLC
Box1444 *
Front Royal, Virginia, USA (VA 22630)
Email: Tom.Christoffel@gmail.com
"Acknowledge boundaries. Work across them. Think local planet, act regionally."
"Acknowledge boundaries. Work across them. Think local planet, act regionally."
Call for Papers - Mobilising regions: territorial strategies for growth - due July 12, 2013
Mobilising regions: territorial strategies for growth
Regional Studies Association
Winter Conference
Friday 22nd
November
2013, London, UK
CALL
FOR PAPERS
Abstract submission deadline Friday 12th July 2013 – Registration opens 24th May 2013
One of the major impacts of the current economic crisis is the increased pressure to find new solutions to often deep- seated societal and political-economic problems, particularly at the scale of cities and regions. What is being demanded are new territorial development strategies capable of arresting economic decline and providing new measures in support of economic growth, whilst at the same time managing territorial inequality and responding to concerns over the democratic legitimacy of existing decision-making structures and public policy interventions. Making this an even more demanding set of challenges is the requirement that all this be delivered within a package that affords a more balanced and environmentally sustainable model for the future, and at a time when the scope for public intervention is being diminished as a result of widespread austerity measures.
Unable to rely solely on state intervention, regions and localities are today faced with the challenge of finding new ways of managing their own territorial development. Success increasingly depends on an ability to mobilise a broad range of public and private actors in support of particular territorial development strategies, models, and interventions. This is leading to the emergence of new territorial alliances and new loci and/or expressions of territorial cooperation aimed at mobilising regions in pursuit of particular political and economic goals. Yet this is only part of the story. For regions and localities are also where competing political and economic agendas increasingly collide, meaning new sites and forms of territorial conflict are emerging as other actors mobilise to resist particular territorial development strategies, models, and interventions.
What this is giving rise to are new forms and expressions of territorial cooperation and conflict around questions to do with economic restructuring, new economic developments, infrastructure, the collective provision of services, and governmentalised remapping’s of state space. This is particularly evident, for instance, in debates for and against Scottish and Catalan independence, the need for austerity driven welfare reforms, and investment in major infrastructure development (e.g. High Speed 2 in the UK, metropolitan transit oriented development in North America).
In this context it is timely to ask some searching questions as to how regions are being mobilised in support of, or opposition to, particular territorial development models and strategies. The Regional Studies Association Winter Conference 2013 on Mobilising Regions presents a timely opportunity to discuss these important issues, to establish the need and nature of future research imperatives, and to address the concerns and challenges confronting policymakers and practitioners. Contributions are therefore invited which focus primarily, although not necessarily exclusively, on one or more of the following themes:
· New sites and forms of territorial cooperation and/or conflict at the scale of regions and localities
· Cooperation, disputes and resistance around particular
territorial development strategies, models, and interventions
· Empirical and conceptual understandings of how regions are mobilised
· The (im)mobility of territorial development models
· The role of leadership in mobilising regions
Academic Organisers: John Harrison: J.Harrison4@lboro.ac.uk,
Pedro Marques: marques@geographie.uni-kiel.de
Pedro Marques: marques@geographie.uni-kiel.de
RSA Organiser: Lesa Reynolds: lesa.reynolds@regionalstudies.org
Regional Studies Association, 25 Clinton Place, Seaford, BN25 1NP, UK Tel: + 44 (0)1323 899 698 – Fax: + 44 (0)1323 899 798
Email: events@regionalstudies.org – www.regionalstudies.org
Regional Studies Association, 25 Clinton Place, Seaford, BN25 1NP, UK Tel: + 44 (0)1323 899 698 – Fax: + 44 (0)1323 899 798
Email: events@regionalstudies.org – www.regionalstudies.org
Reg. Charity No. 1084165 – Reg. in England and Wales No.
4116288

